Integrity Test
London ·
QA partner/Release assurance/Est. 2022

We sign the build off, so nobody else has to.

Integrity Test is a small London QA practice. We take release responsibility at the point where a mistake is expensive: regression packs, gate reviews, automation that runs before deploy rather than after the incident.

Book a gate review →
Registered
England & Wales
Company
14302043
Office
Great Portland St, W1W
Engagements
Retainer or fixed scope

What we take on

Five lines of work. No strategy decks, no tooling resale.

01

Release gate reviews

A dated checklist run against the candidate build, ending in a written go / no-go with the risk named plainly. Used before major deploys and app-store submissions.

02

Regression packs

Suites that re-verify every defect we have ever found, re-run each release so fixed bugs stay fixed and nobody argues from memory.

03

Automation built in your stack

Playwright and Cypress suites wired into your pipeline, with flake accounting from the first commit. Maintained by whoever wrote it.

04

Exploratory sessions

Time-boxed, charter-led probing of the areas the scripted run never reaches. Findings land as tickets with reproduction steps.

05

Device breadth waves

Coordinated passes across handsets, browsers and assistive setups that your own lab does not stock, run by paid testers.

How a gate review runs

Predictable on purpose. The scope is agreed in writing before anybody touches the build.

  1. Charter

    You send the release candidate, the change list and the risk you care about most. We return a scope and a date.

  2. Run

    Scripted regression, then targeted exploration around the changes. Everything is captured in one log with evidence attached.

  3. Verdict

    Go, no-go, or conditional with named blockers. Written for the person who signs, not the person who codes.

  4. Retest

    Fixes are verified against the same evidence inside the retest window, then the pack is updated for next time.

Independence clause. We do not resell licences, we do not train your team as a deliverable, and the reviewer who signs the verdict is the one who ran the tests.

Companies House record →

For testers

Some of our work needs people rather than a lab: odd handsets, regional network conditions, assistive tech combinations. Those sessions are briefed, time-boxed and paid per accepted run.

  • 18 or over, UK-based
  • Any device you already own — the older the better
  • Written brief, no experience required
  • Paid per accepted session, not per hour
  • No exclusivity, take one or take none

Join the panel

Leave your details and we will send the next brief that matches your kit.

Start a conversation

One form, one reply within a working day. If we are wrong for the job we will say so.